The San Diego Padres have acquired closer Huston Street from the Colorado Rockies for a PTBNL and cash considerations.
It’s hard to truly evaluate this deal until the player heading to Colorado is identified. The cash, apparently, is $.5 million in 2012 and the $.5 million buyout in 2013 if the option is declined.
Anyway, I had read a lot about how the Padres were looking to acquire a proven closer, and I was thinking about drafting an article on why they shouldn’t. If you know how I feel about how the Padres should approach this offseason, you probably know why. The Padres are unlikely to be a true contender next year, so whether they have a “proven” closer or Luke Gregerson/Ernesto Frieri isn’t all that significant.
It wouldn’t be wise to invest too much, in dollars or prospects, on a relief pitcher. However, if we assume the Padres lost a relatively insignificant player, this deal isn’t all that bad. The Padres will owe Street $7 million in 2012, not a bad price for a solid closer. Further, they don’t have to commit any length or dollars to Street if things don’t work out.
Street’s a very good reliever who will benefit greatly – like any pitcher would – from switching to Petco Park from Coors. Seriously, that’s one end of the spectrum to the other. Street’s stats:
| Street | Innings | ERA | HR/9 | BB/9 | K/9 |
| OAK (05-08) | 269 | 2.88 | .6 | 2.6 | 9.1 |
| COL (09-11) | 167.3 | 3.50 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 9.1 |
Street was better with Oakland (he also threw more innings/year), but he’s remained effective with the Rockies. In fact, his strikeout-to-walk ratio has actually improved with Colorado. He’s struggled more with the long ball, which has hurt his value, but that should be remedied by a move to Petco.
Street makes the Padres better in 2012, but even if they’re not competitive (very likely), they can use him as a trade chip at the deadline. Closers can attract a lot of attention from contenders with bullpen problems mid-season, and if Street can prove he’s still an asset in the back-end of the pen, he’ll have a number of suitors.
This isn’t a great deal, and it doesn’t really fit into a long-term plan to rebuild. But it also doesn’t sacrifice prospects (hopefully) or a big dollar commitment to improve in the short-term. And it’s hard to blame the Padres for at least attempting to improve the major league club for next season.
Word is that the PTBNL is a minor league pitcher. They didn’t take anybody off the 40 man roster, so the PTBNL must be unprotected to the Rule V draft. That makes me nervous – that’s how the Padres lost Joakim Soria.
Someone needs to trade O’Dowd
Well then I hope the Rockies are happy with Nick Schmidt
Yeah, it was Nick Schmidt. Hasn’t got past High-A ball by age 25. Not a big loss. Has size, left-handedness, and some decent numbers, but not a legit prospect at this point.