by Myron Logan

I think we’ve posted after every Strasburg start so far, so I figured I may as well keep that going. Against UNLV, he faced 28 batters: 14 ks, 1 bb, 6 hits, 2 runs. SDSU won 4-3. UNLV is currently ranked 133rd in the nation by Boyd’s World; last year they were at 115.

So far, Strasburg has 59 strikeouts and 107 batters faced, a 55% k rate.

by Mike Rogers

Stephen Strasburg started again today against the cross-town rivals, University of San Diego, beating the Toreros 5-3 on the back of another gem by Stephen Strasburg. His line today was:

8 IP, 5 H, 2  R, 2 ER, 18 K, 1 BB, 1 HR allowed, 1 2B.

Yeah, that brings his 2009 line up to:

20.1 IP, 13 H, 5 R, 4 ER, 45 K, 4 BB, 1 HR allowed,  3 2B, 0 3B.

I’m not making these things up. He really is striking out 60.8% (45 K’s)of the batters he faces (74) while walking just 5.5% — which is actually UP from his 4.4% BB rate of last year.

But, his mechanics should be under some scrutiny as they’re very Mark Prior-like. Read more after the jump…

Read the rest of this entry »

by Mike Rogers

ey, listen, I know there’s been A TON on Stephen Strasburg all over the internet, and recently here at Friar Forecast. That said, this was just way to good to not mention, even if there’s barely a chance that he’ll fall to the Padres at No. 3 overall.

Stephen Strasburg struck out 16 batters last night. No, I’m not kidding and I didn’t create him in a video game. His second start of the year nearly doubled his strikeout total from his first start. So, we can safely assume something in the neighborhood of 27 strikeouts in start 3 for him.

Now, he was pitching against the Nevada Wolf Pack, but still. 16 K’s is remarkable.

His final line in the game:
6.2 IP, 5 H, 2 R, 2 ER, 1 BB, 16 K, 26 Batters Faced.

His line through two games:

2-0, 12.1 IP, 8 H, 3 R, 2 ER, 3 BB, 27 K, 1 HBP, 49 Batters Faced. Yes, he is striking out 55.1% percent of the batters he faces, while walking just 6.1%.

Fun fact: the rest of the San Diego State pitching staff has 21 K’s and 8 BB’s on the season.

Here’s a cool video of Stephen Strasburg’s 23 strikeout game vs. Utah last year:

H/T: Beyond the Box Score

Utah was ranked 82 last year in D1 by Boyd’s World, so they weren’t exactly pushovers. The game was played in SDSU’s park, which has a PF of 113, though it doesn’t matter much when balls don’t get put into play.

Anyway, this kid is pretty good. You may have heard, but he’s expected –he’s almost a lock — to go number one in the ‘09 draft, and the Padres pick at #3.

Regardless of where he’s drafted and how he performs in pro ball, I’m interested in following this guy’s final college season.

by Mike Rogers

With the talk of Stephen Strasburg’s starts in 2008, as well as how his opening start of the 2009 campaign, and some of the work I did breaking down the Padres 2008 draft (albeit, with tweaks I’ve made to my system since writing those, the numbers have changed a bit)  being bandied about ’round here, I’m coming by with some more college statistics-related things.

First up, Myron and I penned an article for Rich Lederer’s fantastic Baseball Analysts website. It basically is an outline of adjusting college offensive numbers to the best that I know how at this point (suggestions are aboslutely welcome).

Some good work has been done recently over at Project Prospect:

-Top 30 pitching prospects.
-Top 50 pitchers under the age of 25.
-Some article comparing the Mets 18th overall draft pick, Ike Davis, and the Mariners’ 66th overall draft pick, Dennis Raben. I bring it up because this cool guy is also writing this linkage post.

But the one that made me most excited: Lincoln Hamilton’s 2009 Draft “Big Board.” This is definitely subject to change, as all ‘big boards’ are, throughout the college season. I plan on manually entering in the numbers of college hitters (and pitchers, though I’m FAR less comfortable divulging that info at the moment since there are so many things that goes into evaluating pitchers) starting in early-to-mid March and tracking it every couple of weeks — I can bring some updates here. There’s also a thread on Lincoln’s article over there. If you’re not a member of those forums, and like studying prospects, I really would urge you to join. The articles are great, but that forum is civil, well-run, and is built on the accessability of the writers, and depth of knowledge of all the people that post there. A ton of great discussion that isn’t always prompted by the site’s founders. Even if you just want to lurk and read the discussion going on, there’s a ton of links, valuable information, and nice breakdowns by guys who do actually have scouting backrounds and/or current jobs as part-time area scouts. Great stuff.

Also, Project Prospect has started rolling out their annual Team Top 5’s (plus 3-5 honorable mentions), which will then lead to their Top 200 Prospect List. I will be doing the Padres top 5 over there.

Speaking of Prospect Lists, a little publication I like to call Baseball America released their top 100 list which means all of the big guns have released their lists. Baseball Prospectus and ESPN (A.K.A. Keith Law) already released their lists and the Sporting News released a top 50 earlier.

By Ben Davey

The Aztecs kicked off their season last night with a win 6-3 over Bethune Cookman. I decided to listen to the game and chart the pitch selection of one Stephen Strasburg (Elstron was announcing a majority of the pitches and would say either fastball or breaking ball, so I managed to record about 90% of pitch selection).

Strasburg’s line: 5.2 IP, 3 H, 1 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 11 K, 1 HBP, 1 WP, 103 pitches

He only had two 1,2,3 innings (2nd and 4th).

He threw four different pitches in the start, two of them fastballs (four seamer (mainly) and added a two seamer this year), as well as a slider (more of a cutter) and a breaking ball (curve).  The two seamer sat in the low 90’s (91-94), while the four seamer hit 98 on the gun (generally 94-96, topped out at 98).  The slider had some serious bite, but it seemed like he had a lot of problems locating it and had to rely mainly on the FB.

74% of the pitches he threw in the game were fastballs, and of the 24 batters he faced only four of them were started off with anything other then the fastball.

Of the batters he did throw a first pitch FB to, 80% of them started the count down 0-1 (or were out on the 1st pitch).  In fact, of the few batters that did start 1-0, NONE of them worked the count to 2-0.
7 of his 11 K’s came via the fastball, however three of his last four K’s came via offspeed pitches (curve and slider).

The outfielders could have taken the day off.  Only two outs (the very first out of the game and the last out of the 5th) came via a fly ball, the rest were all grounders.  Of those four grounders, all but one of them were hit to the right side (second out in the second went 6-3).

The result:  Strasburg was clearly the most dominant pitcher in baseball last year, and showed why in this game.  In the first start of the season you do not expect the ace to be perfect, but he was right up there (The run that scored got into scoring position via a PB, but it could have been a WP; that was why it was unearned).  He does need to work on spotting his curve, and could probably throw the two seamer more often because it can result in earlier outs to conserve his pitch count.  Overall, though, Strasburg was dominant, and I would be amazed if he fell to us at #3.  But keep your fingers crossed, anyway.

By Myron Logan

As you can probably tell, from this post and the last, I’m in college baseball/draft mode. It’s a little early (at least for draft stuff), though the start of the college season, right around the corner, is probably the source of my anxiousness.

Anyway, with the help of the SDSU website and Boyd’s World, I tracked down each of Stephen Strasburg’s 13 starts from last season, and added the park factor for the stadium where the game was pitched and the opposing team’s ISR rank (described here; think RPI, but better). I included the ISR’s to show what caliber of opponents he faced. We really only care about their offense, of course, not total team strength, but this will have to serve as a proxy for offensive prowess. Anyway, here’s the chart. Make of it what you wish:

Look at how he turned it on after the start at Utah. Through then, here are his totals:

33.3 inn, 18 runs, 35 hits, 6 walks, 38 ks
after
64 inn, 8 runs, 26 hits, 10 walks, 96 ks

Remember, of course, the same size here is extremely small — especially when we start slicing and dicing — like half the size of a full MLB pitcher’s season.

What also stands out to me are the park factors. He didn’t pitch in a pitcher’s park all year. The average PF for stadiums he pitched in was 117. If you assumed his road parks were neutral, which is what we often do in the majors, you’d get a PF of like 108. In reality, his road parks, collectively, were actually tougher than his home park. That’s tough luck, but I suppose comes with the territory when you pitch in the hitter-friendly Mountain West Conference.

The average ISR of teams he faced was 73, which seems relatively high, though I admittedly have nothing to compare it against. Five of his 13 starts came against teams rated in the top 40.

With the Padres holding the third pick in the 2009 draft, Strasburg very well may not be available. In case you haven’t been following the hype, Strasburg is as big of a college prospect as we’ve had in a few years, to say the least. In a recent chat, Kevin Goldstein said he’d rank him in the top three on his top 100 list right now. That isn’t his top 100 college prospects; it’s his top 100 minor league baseball prospects.

A lot can happen between now and the draft, like, uh, Strasburg’s junior campaign. It’ll be a fun one to follow, even if the Pads don’t get a chance to take the young right hander.