Archive - Adrian Gonzalez RSS Feed

Does Petco really devour lefties?

We interrupt your regularly-scheduled programming with this important announcement…

I had planned to write my companion piece analyzing overlooked/underlooked prospects, but Steve Adler at Friarhood posed an interesting question on his website about left-handed slugging Padres at Petco. His article brings up some pertinent ideas as to whether the Padres have had a bona fide lefty slugger with a tendency to pull. Consequently, he wonders if Petco has been given an erroneous reputation as a lefty killer.

The question got me thinking, and I honestly couldn’t come up with any pull lefty sluggers except for Ryan Klesko, and he was at Petco near the end of his career. Adrian Gonzalez was a lefty slugger, but he did not rely on the ability to pull for much of his power.

So, when the lefties don’t come to you, you go to the lefties. I compiled a list of 15 left-handed hitters who have had 25 or more at bats at Petco. Why 25+ AB’s? Well, it’s not a great sample size, admittedly, but after doing the research, I wanted to include many players in the analysis. Now, they’re not all “sluggers,” in a true sense either, as the lowest career SLG% on my list belongs to Ichiro Suzuki at .421. I wanted to take a somewhat broader approach in looking at how lefties have hit for extra bases at Petco.

I researched the players’ career at bats at Petco, focusing on 2B, 3B, HR, and SLG%. I then compared their Petco SLG to their Career SLG. The results were interesting. For the table below, I sorted the data based on the amount of change between their SLG percentages.

PLYR AB 2B 3B HR PetcoSLG CareerSLG Change
J. Loney 26 1 0 0 0.154 0.432 -0.278
C. Gonzalez 82 4 0 2 0.354 0.521 -0.167
C. Utley 78 4 0 2 0.410 0.505 -0.095
P. Fielder 61 3 0 4 0.459 0.540 -0.081
A. Gonzalez 1410 66 5 57 0.442 0.514 -0.072
E. Hinske 30 3 0 0 0.400 0.437 -0.037
I. Suzuki 92 4 1 0 0.391 0.421 -0.030
A. Huff 93 6 0 3 0.441 0.466 -0.025
T. Helton 34 4 0 1 0.559 0.550 0.009
R. Howard 78 5 1 5 0.590 0.560 0.030
J. Heyward 36 4 0 1 0.500 0.427 0.073
A. Dunn 90 4 0 7 0.578 0.503 0.075
A. LaRoche 106 10 0 7 0.594 0.478 0.116
B. McCann 67 6 0 4 0.627 0.486 0.141
J. Votto 40 2 0 4 0.750 0.550 0.200

As you can see from the table above, of the 15 guys profiled,  eight have seen a decrease in their slugging percentage points while playing at Petco. For those eight players, the average decrease in SLG was seven points. For the remaining seven players, their SLG% increased at Petco. The average increase for that group was over nine percentage points.

So, what in the world does all of this mean?

I’m definitely not a sabermetrician, and my wife (as well as my English students) would certainly question my proficiency in mathematics, but it seems to me that it’s a coin toss as to whether a player’s ability to hit for extra bases is hampered by Petco. In James Loney’s case, his slugging drops a whopping 28 percentage points in San Diego…but then again, he barely qualifies with 26 AB’s. Carlos Gonzalez, on the other hand, has 82 AB’s but sees a point drop of 17 in his SLG percentage. On the opposite end you find that Joey Votto swings for extras nearly 20 points better.

I think, in order for the park to have a reputation as a place where lefties can’t hit, you’d like to see some more definitive results. Instead of eight…maybe that number should be more like 10 or even 12. Or…maybe their production should drop more dramatically. Instead of seven percentage points, maybe closer to 10? In this comparison, the data seems to point to Petco being fairly neutral to lefties and their ability to hit for extra bases.

Now…this is certainly no standard regression analysis. There aren’t any figures for variance or deviation. Are there flaws? Sure. Maybe the comparison between Petco SLG% and career SLG% isn’t comparing apples to apples. Maybe day games vs. night games or weather should be a factor. Maybe the pitchers they faced should be included in the analysis. Maybe I should have calculated their SLG% after pulling out the Petco AB’s. The list goes on and on.

But that’s the thing about studying baseball and statistics. There are always “ifs” and “maybes” when looking at the data. I guess the point of this piece, then, is to get the conversation going and discover some more angles on this topic. It is true, I’ve heard Petco described as a place lefties go to die, but I’m starting to question what information that reputation has been built upon.

I have seen lots of good work done on how Petco suppresses offense. And the data above bears this out as well. The average career SLG% for those 15 players is .493. The average Petco SLG% for that same group is .483, a fairly significant 10 point drop in slugging percentage points at Petco.

However, if we start specifying that a certain type of hitter is stifled, we should tread carefully before making that final determination.

Adrian Gonzalez trade links

Your one-stop shop for everyone’s opinion on the big trade:

Padres sites Red Sox sites Elsewhere
Ducksnorts Red Sox Beacon FanGraphs, FG #2
Gaslamp Ball Over The Monster Baseball Analysts
The Sacrifice Bunt The Joy of Sox Hardball Talk
Friarhood Fire Brand of the AL  
Union Tribune Sox Therapy  
Padres.com    

Let me know if you have any more good ones in the comments.

Adrian Gonzalez: Still a Padre (for now)

According to numerous sources, the Adrian Gonzalez deal has apparently fell through, as the Boston Red Sox were not able to reach a contract extension with the slugger. The deal can still be completed, without the extension, but it is unclear whether that is going to happen.\

UPDATE: According to Jon Heyman (and others), the trade is apparently “done,” and we should expect a press conference tomorrow.

Adrian Gonzalez dealt to Red Sox

The San Diego Padres finally pulled the trigger on a move that has been anticipated for a long time, trading first basemen Adrian Gonzalez to the Boston Red Sox for four prospects (RHP Casey Kelley, 1B Anthony Rizzo, OF Reymond Fuentes, and a PTBNL).

Trading Gonzalez is immensely difficult, of course, because he has been the face of the franchise for the five seasons he’s played in San Diego, transforming from a very good player in his first three seasons to an MVP candidate in his last two.  You probably know the numbers by heart, but for one final time, courtesy of Baseball Reference:

Year BA OBP SLG WAR
2006 .304 .362 .500 2.9
2007 .282 .347 .502 3.8
2008 .279 .361 .510 2.9
2009 .277 .407 .551 7.0
2010 .298 .393 .511 6.0
06-10 .288 .374 .514 22.6

Over those five seasons, Gonzalez didn’t even earn $10 million, so it is understandable that he wants to cash in when his current contract expires after the 2011 season. While it would be great if Gonzalez could have been retained beyond next season, it is simply unrealistic due to the financial issues surrounding the Padres (both the ownership issue and the San Diego market in general).

The only real question remaining was whether or not to deal Gonzalez now, wait until the trade deadline, or hold onto him for one more season and accept some draft picks in return. The Padres apparently did their analysis, and concluded that trading him now would best suit the organization.

The next issue, then, is how much surplus value Gonzalez has. Assuming that he’s a 5 WAR player and that teams will pay $4.5M for a marginal win on the free agent market, Gonzalez should be worth around $22.5M next season (if paid as a free agent). That number could easily be higher or lower depending on how you evaluate Gonzalez and what figure you use for $/win. It is merely a reasonable estimate.

Gonzalez will earn just $6.3M in 2011, therefore his surplus value ($22.5 minus $6.3) is around $16.2M. Factoring in the $5M estimate for the draft picks the Padres would have received when Adrian left for free agency, his total surplus value end up at $21M.

While that’s a nice number, it’s limited by the fact that Adrian only has one year left on his (extremely reasonable) contract. A player with, say, two or three years left before free agency, despite being less talented than Gonzalez, may garner more in a trade simply because they have more surplus value.

Next question, please. How much are the four prospects worth that the Padres acquired? For that, we can use the estimated values developed by Victor Wang, and displayed in a chart on this post.

The most highly regarded prospect the Padres will receive is right-handed starter Casey Kelley. Kelley is a 21 year old righty who didn’t decide to pitch full time until late 2009 (he was a great shortstop in college). Kelley sits in the low-to-mid nineties and has two solid off-speed offerings in the curve and changeup.

He struggled a bit last season, but it’s tough to get too caught up in 95 innings of minor league work, especially considering that he was 20 years old and in double-A (not to mention, the aforementioned switch to being solely a pitcher should pay off in the future). According to Baseball America, Kelley ranked as the 24th best prospect in baseball prior to last season – worth ~$16M.

The Padres have also acquired 21 year old first basemen Anthony Rizzo. The left-hand hitting Rizzo has put up solid, if not spectacular minor league numbers, and is also reportedly a very good fielder. Rizzo hit .260/.334/.480 last season, splitting time between high-A and double-A ball. Ranked as a B- prospect by John Sickels (last season), we  can estimate his surplus value at $5.5M.

Reymond Fuentes is the youngest prospect heading San Diego’s way at just 19 years old. Again, his numbers aren’t overly impressive, but he’s a young, toolsy outfielder who is certainly going to take some time to develop. Also rated as a B- prospect, we can estimate him at $5.5M.

In conclusion, here are our very rudimentary estimations:

Team Player Surplus Value
Red Sox Gonzalez $21M
Total   $21M
     
Padres Kelley $16M
  Rizzo $5.5M
  Fuentes $5.5M
  PTBNL ?
Total   $27M

Frankly, I am *not* confident in these numbers, for numerous reasons. They do, however, give us a simplified model to show how a deal like this may be viewed from each side. The Red Sox get the most valuable player, a guy they can build around for years – if they lock him up long-term (which is very probable). The Padres cash in their most valuable chip and receive three (maybe four) very nice prospects to hopefully build around in the future.

While a lot of people wanted the Padres to try to compete in 2011, it seemed to me that would be unlikely even with Gonzalez. Last season they caught lighting in a bottle and played great, but the chances of doing that again are just not that likely. In the end, it was time to trade Gonzalez, at least from a baseball perspective.

As Marc Normandin nicely sums up on his Red Sox blog, Boston wins in the short-term by getting Gonzalez in the arms race that is the AL East and the Padres win long-term by acquiring some nice pieces for the future.

Rebuild mode, activate! Padres deal Gonzalez to Red Sox

The San Diego Padres have finally cashed in their most valuable asset, trading Adrian Gonzalez to the Boston Red Sox for three prospects (RHP Casey Kelley, 1B Anthony Rizzo, and OF Reymond Fuentes) and a player to be named later.

The Padres are clearly going to have a tough time competing this season, dealing away by far their best offensive force. However, they’ve just made an already solid farm system that much better, adding three highly regarded prospects into the mix.

We’ll have more analysis as the day unfolds and things become official. For now, feel free to discuss the trade here.

Page 1 of 41234»